|
4
Global statistics 4 Australian statistics The Impact of an Ageing Population Lifestyle and Ageing Participation and Ageing
Our Vision Our Values
This report was prepared by Special thanks to Dr Keith Suter (Consultant, Social Policy), Tracy Carr (Aged Care R&D), David McGovern (Public Relations Manager), Lyndal Parker (Graphic Designer) and Steven Chapman (Production Co-ordinator), Rev Dr Les Underwood and Rev Helen Edgerton. |
The Impact of an Ageing Population Old age is a relatively new factor in the history of the human race. At the turn of the century, life expectancy in Australia was 45 for men and 46 for women. Now it is 75 for men and 81 for women. We know that Australia's population is ageing! By 2041, the Australian Bureau of Statistics predicts that one in five people will be over 65 and 7% of the population will be aged over 80 (the fastest growing group in Australia). There are several reasons for this trend.
The cost of ageing Of 10 OECD countries surveyed:
Whilst many regard the ageing of the population as a triumph of a civilised and caring society, others see it as a major problem facing the community. The 'bulge' of baby boomers, born after World War II, is set to start retiring from about 2005 onwards. Whilst there has been a marked decline in Australia's birth rate over the last 30 years, we are enjoying an ever-increasing longevity amongst the population. The income to support the growing number of retired people will come from three main sources: the age pension, the employees' compulsory superannuation scheme begun in 1992, and their voluntary savings. Who will pay the medical bills when the baby boomers reach old age? The current crisis in health care and hospital waiting lists may well be early warning signs of a far more significant crisis to come. A recent survey showed:
This is very bad news because experts are estimating boomers will need at least $1 million of assets to retire.10 The support of the elderly will require an enormous workforce. Currently, around 10% of persons over 70 years are in institutional care, costing about $40,000 per year. Given the implications of our demographic time bomb, this issue demands attention. While we are concerned about finding employment for older persons who have been displaced as a result of technological change, it is also evident that we need to focus on the potential of the workforce required to cope with the care of our aged and disabled. This is the industry with the most rapidly increasing demand for workers. (Sweden has one of the highest female workforce participation rates in the world. The biggest employment sector for women there is caring for the aged and disabled). While such caring has long been seen as "women's work", ABS data reveals that in Australia, about half of our carers are male.11 Ageing and Workforce Participation Even though we are living longer, we are not working longer. In fact, men in particular, are retiring earlier than ever before.
Compulsory retirement for men at 65 years, or women at 60 years, even though illegal, is now rarely an issue. At 55 years, people become eligible to take their superannuation payout. However, while early retirement is a voluntary option for some men, for others it is because they cannot find employment. As well as encouraging all Australians to invest for their retirement, another way to help ease the above problem of funding our ageing population is to educate business people, especially human resource managers, against ageism. Despite the implementation of legislation against age discrimination in the workplace, ageism can be disguised in many subtle forms. Not only those in their 60's but also in their 40's and 50's are experiencing great difficulties in finding employment due to persisting stereotypes. An Australian study reported that 64% of persons aged 55 years and over stated that their age was the main difficulty in finding work, compared to 16% of people aged between 35 and 44 years.13 Research has found that many employers believe that older persons (even as young as 45) have a shorter working life and will therefore provide lower returns to the company. This assumption not only makes employers reluctant to employ older workers but also to re-train them. Lack of training translates into fewer skills and perpetuates the belief that older workers are unable and/or unwilling to learn and lack skills. The removal of age discrimination against older workers is expected to have social benefits such as increasing the GDP, raising revenue from taxation and reducing spending on welfare.14
Research in Europe, which appears to be several years ahead of Australia in tackling issues about ageing populations, indicates the benefits of retaining workers beyond the age of 45. Evidence shows older workers' job performance is better than younger workers. Older people learn how to do things better through years of experience of working. The British government has drawn up a code of practice to raise employer awareness about the benefits of employing older workers, and Germany has introduced a gradual retirement scheme, allowing Germans to work part-time leading up to retirement. A London researcher, Dr Phillip Taylor, warned employers about the long term social costs of discriminating against older workers, maintaining that if they are fit and able, there is no reason why people cannot keep working at 75 or even 80.16
Past, and even current, superannuation has had significant shortcomings. One of these is the result of women's employment patterns. Women have generally always been the carers of society, raising families, homemaking and caring for elderly and disabled relatives and friends, and these duties do not generate an income or, therefore, superannuation. Up to the 1960's and 70's, even if they were working full-time, women were not generally offered superannuation. Now retired or retiring, they must rely on the pension or their husband's generosity. Even today, the most usual work pattern for women is broken employment periods with some part-time work, while the most common pattern for men is continued full-time employment. For these reasons, a large enough amount of superannuation to live on is much more likely to be accumulated by men than women. Single women are the group most likely to live in poverty in old age. They have not accumulated superannuation, they do not have a husband for support, and the low pension rates keep them close to or below the poverty line.19 The size of the baby boom population has been sufficient to easily provide the necessary number of taxpayers to finance the welfare provisions Australia currently supplies (about 4.3 million baby boomers compared to about 2.2 million in the over 65 year age group.) However, a radical change will occur in the relationship between the number of people in retirement and the number of up-and-coming taxpayers available to fund pension and health-care benefits when the population 'bulge' moves into old age.
|